How Accessible Are Healthy Alternatives?: Descriptive Study of Food Environments at Argentine Universities

Authors

  • Carolina Begué Dirección Nacional de Promoción de la Salud y Control de Enfermedades Crónicas No Transmisibles, Ministerio de Salud y Desarrollo Social de la Nación, Argentina.
  • Lucila Goldberg Dirección Nacional de Promoción de la Salud y Control de Enfermedades Crónicas No Transmisibles, Ministerio de Salud y Desarrollo Social de la Nación, Argentina
  • Ana King Dirección Nacional de Promoción de la Salud y Control de Enfermedades Crónicas No Transmisibles, Ministerio de Salud y Desarrollo Social de la Nación, Argentina.
  • Victoria O’Donnell Dirección Nacional de Promoción de la Salud y Control de Enfermedades Crónicas No Transmisibles, Ministerio de Salud y Desarrollo Social de la Nación, Argentina.
  • Laura Raquel Piaggio Programa Nutricional, Ministerio de Salud del Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Marina Inés Rolón Programa Nutricional, Ministerio de Salud del Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina

Keywords:

Healthy Diet, Obesity, Overweight, Social Environment, Universities

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of overweight in young people in Argentina between 18 and 24 years is estimated at 33%. Considering that the university environment is a strategic place for health interventions in this age group, the objective of the study was to describe the physical and economic characteristics of food selling points at Argentine universities. METHODS: A cross-sectional multicenter descriptive study was conducted. Food selling points of 174 university buildings were surveyed through non-participant observation and registration in structured forms, considering following variables: offer of free safe water; characteristics of the offer of food and beverages at points of sale; informal sale; presence of advertising and presence of health promotion messages. RESULTS: In 36% of the buildings there was no offer of free safe water. A total of 301 points of sale of food and/or beverages were observed, with 93% offering sugary sodas, 88% bottled water (with or without gas) and 86% sugary flavored waters and light sodas. A combined analysis showed that the presence of promoted products was not a determining factor for the reduction of the offer of non-recommended or allowed products. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to advance in the regulation of food environments at universities, since the results are alarming. There is also a need to deepen the standards for the certification of healthy universities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

27-12-2019

How to Cite

Begué, C. ., Goldberg , L. ., King , A. ., O’Donnell , V. ., Piaggio , L. R., & Rolón, M. I. . (2019). How Accessible Are Healthy Alternatives?: Descriptive Study of Food Environments at Argentine Universities. Revista Argentina De Salud Pública, 10(41), 37–45. Retrieved from https://www.rasp.msal.gov.ar/index.php/rasp/article/view/105